Universidad de Granada

ReiDoCrea

Article 59

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Mathematical Mindset Scale (MMS) for High School Students

İlknur Gülşen Turgut – Kütahya Dumlupınar University, Türkiye - ORCID: 0000-0002-1721-7498

Nur Şebnem Bakır – Aydınlıkevler Anatolian High School, Türkiye - ORCID: 0000-0002-0610-8851

Abstract

Despite the expanding literature on mindset, domain-specific instruments that assess students’ mindsets about mathematical intelligence remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate the Mathematical Mindset Scale (MMS) for high school students. The data were collected from a total of 820 students, with one independent subsample used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 470) and another for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 350). The EFA results revealed a two-factor structure consisting of Growth Mathematical Mindset and Fixed Mathematical Mindset. These factors demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. The two-factor model was subsequently supported by CFA, indicating satisfactory model fit and providing evidence for construct validity. The findings suggest that the MMS is a psychometrically sound and practical instrument for assessing students’ mathematical mindset profiles. The scale has the potential to support research on mindset development and to inform instructional practices aimed at fostering a growth mathematical mindset.

Keyword: Mathematical Mindset

References

Altikulaç, S., Janssen, T. W. P., Yu, J., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Van Atteveldt, N. M. (2024). Mindset profiles of secondary school students: Associations with academic achievement, motivation and school burnout symptoms. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 738-758. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12676

Anderson, R. K., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. A. (2018). Achieving elusive teacher change through challenging myths about learning: A blended approach. Education Sciences, 8(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030098

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491

Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., Pérez-Núñez, G., Sun, K. L., & Williams, C. (2018). Changing students minds and achievement in mathematics: The impact of a free online student course. Frontiers in Education, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00026

Bostwick, K. C. P., Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2017). Students’ growth mindsets, goals, and academic outcomes in mathematics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000287

Boyd, P., & Ash, A. (2018). Mastery mathematics: Changing teacher beliefs around in-class grouping and mindset. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.016

Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., & Macnamara, B. N. (2020). How firm are the foundations of mind-set theory? The claims appear stronger than the evidence. Psychological Science, 31(3), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619897588

Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Routledge.

Chen, J. A., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2017). Implicit theories of ability and self-efficacy: Testing alternative social cognitive models to science motivation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000289

Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset equals income as a predictor of achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(31), 8664-8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113

Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2014). Educational theory, practice, and policy and the wisdom of social psychology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214551559

Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666

Daly, I., Bourgaize, J., & Vernitski, A. (2019). Mathematical mindsets increase student motivation: Evidence from the EEG. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 15, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.005

De Castella, K., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y

De Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2012). Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(4), 695-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.610445

Degol, J. L., Wang, M. T., Zhang, Y., & Allerton, J. (2018). Do growth mindsets in math benefit females? Identifying pathways between gender, mindset, and motivation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 976-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0739-8

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.

Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. -y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-y., & Hong, Y.-y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12

Edwards, A. A., Joyner, K. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2021). A simulation study on the performance of different reliability estimation methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(6), 1089-1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164421994184

Finch, W. H., Immekus, J. C., & French, B. F. (2016). Applied psychometrics using SPSS and AMOS. Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Furnham, A. (2014). Increasing your intelligence: Entity and incremental beliefs about the multiple “intelligences”. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.001

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002

Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659

Gouëdard, P. (2021). Can a growth mindset help disadvantaged students close the gap? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/20922f0d-en

Grieder, S., & Steiner, M. D. (2022). Algorithmic jingle jungle: A comparison of implementations of principal axis factoring and promax rotation in R and SPSS. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01581-x

Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849-1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Huang, X., Zhang, J. & Hudson, L. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z

Im, S., & Park, H.‐J. (2023). A Mathematical Mindset Scale using the positive norms. Psychology in the Schools, 60(8), 2901-2918. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22904

Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898

Kim, M. S., & Park, S. (2021). Growth of fixed mindset from elementary to middle school: Its relationship with trajectories of academic behavior engagement and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 58(11), 2175-2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22583

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Laurell, J., Puusepp, I., Hakkarainen, K., & Tirri, K. (2025). Students’ cross-domain mindset profiles and academic achievement in Finnish lower-secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1514879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1514879

Lee, H. J., Kim, S., & Bong, M. (2025). Social antecedents of children’s mindsets, motivation and achievement in math: Investigating parental beliefs and perceived teacher beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 849-870. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12764

Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126

Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

Orbach, L., & Fritz, A. (2022). A latent profile analysis of math anxiety and core beliefs toward mathematics among children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1509(1), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14720

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). Open University Press.

Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000064

Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784-793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017

Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2021). Study of the factor structure, profiles, and concurrent validity of the mindset assessment profile tool for elementary students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920943456

Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., Rivas, B., & Jones, F. (2017). The relation between global and specific mindset with reading outcomes for elementary school students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(5), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1313846

Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x

Pyper, J. S. (2018). Mathematical mindsets for the teaching and learning of mathematics. In A. Kajander, J. Holm, & E. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning secondary school mathematics. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 165-177). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_17

Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok - Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

Samuel, T. S., & Warner, J. (2021). I can math!”: Reducing math anxiety and increasing math self-efficacy using a mindfulness and growth mindset-based intervention in first-year students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1666063

Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mindsets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

Thibert-Dagenais, C., & Ratelle, C. F. (2024). Math mindsets in elementary school students: testing two conceptualizations of mindsets and their links with achievement and self-concept. Current Psychology, 43(28), 23764-23778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06091-5

Wijaya, T. T., Li, X., & Cao, Y. (2025). Profiles of growth mindset and grit among rural Chinese students and their associations with math anxiety, motivation, and self-efficacy. Scientific Reports, 15, 21513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07400-z

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 8(3), Article 990399. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3

Yan, V. X., & Schuetze, B. A. (2023). What is meant by “growth mindset”? Current theory, measurement practices, and empirical results leave much open to interpretation: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000370

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098

Yu, J., & McLellan, R. (2020). Same mindset, different goals and motivational frameworks: Profiles of mindset-based meaning systems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101901

Zhao, J., & Wang, M. (2014). Mothers’ academic involvement and children’s achievement: Children’s theory of intelligence as a mediator. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.006