ReiDoCrea

Gifted Education in the Age of AI: A Proposal for an Integrated Conceptual Model

Simge Karakaş Mısır – Universidad de Tokat Gaziosmanpşa Üniversitesi - ORCID

Abstract

The distinct cognitive and socio-emotional characteristics of gifted students necessitate differentiated educational approaches tailored to their unique needs. This study aims to address the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) technologies into this field through a human-centered perspective, moving beyond a purely technical viewpoint. Rather than analyzing specific applications, the study presents a theoretical framework focusing on the potential role of AI in supporting both academic and emotional development. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature, the proposed conceptual model integrates four interrelated components: talent identification, personalized learning design, process monitoring, and socio-emotional support. This model positions AI and DL-based systems as elements that support objectivity in identification, deepen personalization, and provide real-time feedback, while emphasizing that these processes must be bounded by pedagogical judgment and ethical principles. Ultimately, this study aims to establish a coherent conceptual foundation capable of guiding future research, pedagogical designs, and policy development regarding the responsible use of technology in gifted education.

Keyword: Gifted Education

References

Ahamed, HR, & Hanirex, DK (2024). A deep learning-enabled approach for real-time monitoring of learner activities in adaptive e-learning environments. Proceedings of International Conference on Circuit Power and Computing Technologies, 846–851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPCT61902.2024.10673041

Alnasyan, B, Basheri, M, & Alassafi, M (2024). The power of deep learning techniques for predicting student performance in virtual learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100231

Arkhangelskaya, EO, & Nikolenko, SI (2023). Deep learning for natural language processing: A survey. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 273(4), 533–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06519-6

Bayly-Castaneda, K, Ramirez-Montoya, M S, & Morita-Alexander, A (2024). Crafting personalized learning paths with AI for lifelong learning: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1424386. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1424386

Blaas, S (2014). The relationship between social-emotional difficulties and underachievement of gifted students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 24(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.1

Bohm, T, et al. (2017). Approach to semi-automatic labeling of video sequences for affective computing -enabling the comprehensive assessment of emotion detection software from mimics. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM 2017), 1996–2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217967

Brink, H (2023). Gifted students’ needs in technology education. Proceedings of the 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference, 1(October).

Brusilovsky, P, & Millán, E (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In The adaptive web (pp. 3–53). Springer.

Calvo, RA, & D’Mello, S (2019). Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 10(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1

Carroll, J B (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312

Celik, M, & Inik, O (2024). Development of hybrid models based on deep learning and optimized machine learning algorithms for brain tumor multi-classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 122159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122159.

Chakravarthi, B, Ng, S C, Ezilarasan, M R, & Leung, M F (2022). EEG-based emotion recognition using hybrid CNN and LSTM classification. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16, 1019776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.1019776

Colangelo, N, & Assouline, S (2009). Acceleration: Meeting the academic and social needs of students. In: Shavinina, LV (eds) International handbook on giftedness. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_55

Cross, TL (2018). On the Social and Emotional Lives of Gifted Children (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003236900

El Naggar, A, Gaad, E, & Inocencio, SAM (2024). Enhancing inclusive education in the UAE: Integrating AI for diverse learning needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 147, 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104685

Feinstein, N (2011). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy and practice. Science Education, 95(3), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20452

Fitzpatrick, KK, Darcy, A, & Vierhile, M (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e7785.doi: 10.2196/mental.7785. PMID: 28588005; PMCID: PMC5478797.

Franceschelli, G, & Musolesi, M (2022). DeepCreativity: Measuring creativity with deep learning techniques. Intelligenza Artificiale, 16(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.3233/IA-220136

Ford, D Y (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237655

Gabrys, RL, Tabri, N, Anisman, H, & Matheson, K (2018). Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: The cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 376606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02219

Gardner, RC (1983). Learning another language: A true social psychological experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2(2-4), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8300200209

Geake, JG, & Hansen, PC (2005). Neural correlates of intelligence as revealed by fMRI of fluid analogies. NeuroImage, 26(2), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.035

Gentry, ML, Pereira, N, Peters, SJ, McIntosh, JS, & Fugate, CM (2015). HOPE teacher rating scale manual. Involving teachers in equitable identification of gifted and talented students in K-12. Waco, TX: Prufrock.

Gierl, M J, Lai, H, & Turner, S R (2012). Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items. Medical Education, 46(8), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x

Goodfellow, I, Bengio, Y, & Courville, A (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.1(2).

Hodges, J, & Mohan, S (2019). Machine learning in gifted education: A demonstration using neural networks. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219867483

Jung, R E, & Haier, R J (2007). The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001185

Kaplan, A, & Haenlein, M (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004

Kang, SH, et al. (2024). Advanced deep learning model for predicting the academic performances of students in educational institutions. Applied Sciences, 14(5), 1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051963

Kuznetsova, E, Liashenko, A, Zhozhikashvili, N, & Arsalidou, M (2024). Giftedness identification and cognitive, physiological and psychological characteristics of gifted children: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1411981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411981

Chen, L, Chen, P, & Lin, Z (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Li, X, et al. (2022). Student achievement prediction using deep neural network from multi-source campus data. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8(6), 5143–5156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00731-8

Liu, T, Wu, Q, Chang, L, & Gu, T (2022). A review of deep learning-based recommender systems in e-learning environments. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(8), 5953–5980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10135-2

Luckin, R, Holmes, W, Griffiths, M, & Forcier, L B (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Open Ideas; Pearson Education, London.

McBee, M T, Peters, S J, & Waterman, C (2014). Combining scores in multiple-criteria assessment systems. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513794

McCarney, S B, & Arthaud, T J (2009). Gifted evaluation scale (3rd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.

McCulloch, W S, & Pitts, W (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259

McGrew, K S (2015). The death penalty and intellectual disability. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.ABD

Mehrish, A, et al. (2023). A review of deep learning techniques for speech processing. Information Fusion, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101869

Neihart, M, Pfeiffer, SI, & Cross, TL (Eds.) (2016). The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What Do We Know? (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003238928

Ouyang, F, et al. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4

Pane, J F, Steiner, E D, Baird, M D, & Hamilton, L S (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.

Panfilova, AS, Valueva, EA, & Ilyin, IY (2024). The application of explainable artificial intelligence methods to models for automatic creativity assessment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1310518. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1310518

Paulhus, DL, & Vazire, S (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239).

Pfeiffer, SI, Blei, S (2008). Gifted Identification Beyond the IQ Test: Rating Scales and Other Assessment Procedures. In: Pfeiffer, S.I. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_10

Pfeiffer, SI (2012). Serving the Gifted: Evidence-Based Clinical and Psychoeducational Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883587

Plucker, JA, & Callahan, C M (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244

Reis, SM, & McCoach, DB (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302

Reis, SM, & Renzulli, J S (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012

Renzulli, J S, & Gaesser, A H (2015). A multi-criteria system for the identification of high-achieving and creative-productive giftedness. Revista de Educación, 368, 96–131.doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-290

Renzulli, JS (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901

Rincon-Flores, EG, et al. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00314-9

Rinn, AN, & Bishop, J (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795

Roid, G, & Barram, R (2004). Essentials of Stanford–Binet intelligence scales (SB5) assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Rosenblatt, F (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386–408.

Rojas Vistorte, A O, Deroncele-Acosta, A, Martín Ayala, J L, Barrasa, A, López-Granero, C, & Martí-González, M (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1387089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089

Russell, S J, & Norvig, P (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Sambuis, S, & Bourdin, B (2024). Teachers’ attitude towards gifted students and their education: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532241301088

Shute, V, & Ventura, M (2013). Stealth Assessment: Measuring and supporting learning in video games. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9589.001.0001

Siemens, G, & Baker, R S (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of 2nd the International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. 252-254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661

Sternberg, RJ (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.

Sternberg, RJ (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3(4), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292

Subotnik, RF, Olszewski-Kubilius, P, & Worrell, FC (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

Tan, M, et al. (2018). MnasNet: Platform-aware neural architecture search for mobile. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2815–2823. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.11626

Thao, LQ, et al. (2024). Monitoring and improving student attention using deep learning and wireless sensor networks. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 367, 115055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115055

Thurstone, L.L. (1973). Primary Mental Abilities. In: The Measurement of Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6129-9_8

Tofel-Grehl, C, Feldon, D F, & Callahan, C M (2018). Impacts of learning standards and testing on gifted learners in STEM schools: A multilevel analytic induction. Roeper Review, 40(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434714

Tomlinson, C A (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

VanTassel-Baska, J, & Stambaugh, T (2008). Curriculum and instructional considerations in programs for the gifted. In In: Pfeiffer, S.I. (eds) Handbook of giftedness in children. Springer. Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_18

VanTassel-Baska, J (2014). Curriculum issues: Back to the future: Differentiated curriculum in the Rear View Mirror. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 200–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514533278

VanTassel-Baska, J, & Brown, E F (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323

Vazire, S, & Mehl, M R (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202–1216.

Warne, R T (2012). History and development of above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 34, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.686425

Wechsler, D (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). Psychological Corporation.

Werbos, P J (1990). Backpropagation through time: What it does and how to do it. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10), 1550–1560. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.58337

Xu, X, et al. (2024). Behavioral observation and assessment protocol for language and social-emotional development study in children aged 0–6: The Chinese baby connectome project. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 533. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02031-x

Yun, G, Lee, K M, & Choi, H H (2024). Empowering student learning through artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1822-1855. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241278636

Zeki, U, Karanfiller, T, & Yurtkan, K (2022). Person-dependent handwriting verification for special education using deep learning. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 36(1), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.032554

Zhai, C, Wibowo, S, & Li, L D (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7