Fostering Sustainable Living Awareness in Gifted Students with Immersive Virtual Reality
Yunus Emre Avcu – Balıkesir University - ORCID
Yavuz Yaman – İstanbul University - Cerrahpaşa - ORCID
Abstract
Gifted students possess the potential to make innovative contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to their ethical sensitivity, advanced problem-solving skills, creative thinking capacity, and heightened awareness of global issues. However, despite their high sensitivity to these topics, they must first develop a personal awareness of sustainable living to fully realize this potential. Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) can support this process by fostering a deeper understanding of environmental challenges and encouraging active engagement in generating effective and innovative solutions, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and equitable society. We aimed to enhance gifted students' sustainable living awareness using IVR. Thirteen 3D scenes were implemented to explore students’ learning experiences and IVR's impact on their awareness. Seventeen gifted students participated (average age 12.4), utilizing a mixed-methods approach combining a case study for qualitative insights and a single-group pre-test-post-test design for quantitative analysis. Data collection tools included the Sustainable Living Awareness Scale (SLAS), the Word Association Test (WAT), and reflective letters. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, showing a significant post-test improvement in SLAS scores. Qualitative findings revealed IVR’s role in deepening engagement with environmental issues, reducing psychological distance, and promoting concrete understanding. Despite these benefits, some students experienced challenges such as focus loss and physical discomfort. The study highlights the potential of IVR in sustainability education for gifted students, recommending strategies to mitigate its challenges for broader application.
Keyword: Immersive virtual reality, IVR
Referencias
Ahn, SJG, Bailenson, JN, & Park, D (2014). Short-and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235-245.
Akgül, FA, & Aydoğdu, M (2020). Development of Sustainable Living Awareness Scale for Middle School Students. Trakya Journal of Education, 10(2), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.633081
Akhan, NE, Çiçek, S, & Kocaağa, G (2022). Critical and creative perspectives of gifted students on global problems: Global climate change. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101131
Avcu, YE (2025). The effect of differentiated science instruction in the metaverse on gifted students’ engagement, self-regulated learning skills, and scientific creativity [Doctoral dissertation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Graduate School of Education].
Avcu, YE, & Yaman, Y (2024). Differentiated Science Instruction in the Metaverse with Gifted Students: Let’s Visit Kaz Mountains National Park!. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 14(2), 46-65.
Avcu, YE, & Yaman, Y (2025). The effect of virtual reality (VR) settings on nature relatedness and attitudes towards environment in gifted students. J Sci Educ Technol, 34, 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10194-w
Ayaydın, Y, Gezer, SU, & Sesen, BA (2023b). A study on sustainable living awareness of gifted secondary school students. Research on Education and Psychology, 7 (Special Issue 2), 602-624. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1363669
Ayaydin, Y, Sesen, BA, ..., & Özçiris, H (2023a). The effect of out-of-school learning activities on gifted students' affective and behavioral tendencies towards the environment. Journal of Science Learning, 6(1), 48-58.
Ayaydın, Y, Ün, D, ..., & Camcı-Erdoğan, S (2018). Environmental awareness and sensitivity of the gifted students: science and art explorers in the nature. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 507-536. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.379723
Bahar, M, Johnstone, AH, & Sutcliffe, RG (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653
Bakar, F, Avan, Ç, & Aydınlı, B (2018). The Attitude Comparison of Gifted Students and Normal Peers on the Recycling and Environmental Effects. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(3), 935-944. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.413389
Balaban, H (2023). The effect of context-based approach on gifted students’ understanding the topic of global warming. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(22), 572-595. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1313695
Bildiren, A, & Çitil, M (2022). Educating gifted children in Turkey: A retrospective analysis and the current state. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(3), 278-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879211050345
Bodur, NC, Tüysüz, C, & Turan, MD (2023). Investigation of the effect of “The poles: Soils waiting to be discovered” activity on the climate change awareness of gifted 6th grade students. Usak University Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.1353824
Boeve-de Pauw, J, Gericke, N, ..., & Berglund, T (2015). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 7(11), 15693-15717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693
Bostan Sarıoğlan, A, & Deveci, B (2021). Determining the cognitive structure of teacher candidates related to nutrition through the word association test. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 9(4), 3003-3017. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.931
Büyüköztürk, Ş, Kılıç Çakmak, E, ..., & Demirel, F (2022). Scientific research methods. Pegem Akademi.
Carlsen, L, & Bruggemann, R (2021). Inequalities in the European Union: A partial order analysis of the main indicators. Sustainability, 13(11), 6278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116278
Ceylan, Ö (2022). The effect of the waste management themed summer program on gifted students’ environmental attitude, creative thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 22(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2020.1859393
Choi, SY, Won, AR, ..., & Kim, CJ (2021). The impacts of a climate change SSI-STEAM program on junior high school students’ climate literacy. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(1), 96-133. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01852-2
Coban, M, Bolat, YI, & Goksu, I (2022). The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100452
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Demir, Y, & Atasoy, E (2021). Investigation of secondary school student 'perceptions on sustainable development. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(3), 1688-1702. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.878404
Fauville, G, Queiroz, ACM, & Bailenson, JN (2020). Virtual reality as a promising tool to promote climate change awareness. Technology and Health, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816958-2.00005-8
Fiedler, ST, Heyne, T, & Bogner, FX (2023). “Sustainable” is synonymous to “eco-friendly”: Student perceptions about sustainability and sustainable behavior. Creative Education, 14(6), 1284-1308. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.146082
Flyvbjerg, B (2011). Case study. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 301-316.
Fritz, CO, Morris, PE, & Richler, JJ (2012). Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
George, D, & Mallery, P (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
Gibson, KL, Rimmington, GM, & Landwehr-Brown, M (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190701836270
Hofman, K, Walters, G, & Hughes, K (2022). The effectiveness of virtual vs real-life marine tourism experiences in encouraging conservation behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(4), 742-766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1884690
Hsiao, PW, & Su, CH (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
Hsu, HCK, & Wang, C (2021). Assessing the impact of immersive virtual reality on objective learning outcomes based on presence, immersion, and interactivity: A Thematic Review. Learning Technologies and User Interaction, 38-73.
Hsu, WC, Tseng, CM, & Kang, SC (2018). Using exaggerated feedback in a virtual reality environment to enhance behavior intention of water-conservation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 187-203.
Huang, X, Huss, J, ..., & Boyd-Devine, A (2023). Cognitive and motivational benefits of a theory-based immersive virtual reality design in science learning. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100124
Işıklı, M, Taşdere, Ah, & Göz, NL (2011). Investigation teacher candidates’ cognitive structure about principles of Ataturk through word association test. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 50-72.
Kagawa, F (2007). Dissonance in students' perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174
Kaplan Sayı, A (2022). Üstün yetenekli çocuğun yaşam üçgeni [The life triangle of the gifted child]. Anı Yayıncılık.
Khatun, N (2021). Applications of normality test in statistical analysis. Open journal of statistics, 11(01), 113. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2021.111006
Kim, EJ, & Kim, HK (2022). Perceptions of the middle school gifted-students and pre-teachers about the convergence class programs using realistic contents. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 66(2), 96–106.
Kleinlogel, EP, Mast, MS, ..., & Brosch, T (2023). Immersive virtual reality helps to promote pro-environmental norms, attitudes and behavioural strategies. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 8, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100105
Kostova, Z, & Radoynovska, B (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 2(2), 209-231.
Lenhard, W, & Lenhard, A (2016). Calculation of Effect Sizes. Psychometrica.
Lewis, RA, Kenerson, MJ, ..., & Rowse, TH (2019). Experiencing sustainability education: Insights from a living and learning programme. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 13(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408219847011
Lovecky, DV (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553451
Makransky, G, & Mayer, RE (2022). Benefits of taking a virtual field trip in immersive virtual reality: Evidence for the immersion principle in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1771-1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09675-4
Makransky, G, & Petersen, GB (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
Makransky, G, Terkildsen, TS, & Mayer, RE (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
Markowitz, DM, & Bailenson, JN (2021). Virtual reality and the psychology of climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.009
Markowitz, DM, Laha, R, ..., & Bailenson, JN (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364
Mayer, RE (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In RE Mayer (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Meijers, MH, Torfadóttir, RH, ..., & Maslowska, E (2023). Experiencing climate change virtually: The effects of virtual reality on climate change related cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Environmental Communication, 17(6), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2229043
Mutlu, F, & Nacaroglu, O (2019). Examination of perceptions of gifted students about climate change and global warming. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(5), 780-192.
Nacaroğlu, O, & Karaaslan, G (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin iklim değişikliğine yönelik bilişsel yapılarının incelenmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(Ek), 1-13.
Nakiboglu, C (2024). Mapping Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Group Cognitive Structure Concerning the Topic of Physical and Chemical Change via the Word Association Method. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01017
Napier RD, & Halsey, RJ (2022). Wicked problems abound: It’s Time to harness the power of transformationally gifted girls’ education. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 31(2), 36-45.
Özarslan, M (2020). A comparison of gifted and non-gifted students' perceptions concerning plants through metaphors. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(1), 1-15.
Özden Çınar, T, Yazıcı, H, & Kaya, MT (2022). Opinions of gifted students on augmented reality application in social studies course1. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1238478
Park, KJ, & Chung, DH (2014). The characteristics of earth system thinking of science gifted students in relation to climate changes. Journal of Gifted/ Talented Education, 24(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.2.271
Petersen, GB, Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
Plechatá, A, Morton, T, ..., & Makransky, G (2022a). Why just experience the future when you can change it: Virtual reality can increase pro-environmental food choices through self-efficacy. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 3(4).
Plechatá, A, Morton, T, ..., & Makransky, G (2022c). A randomized trial testing the effectiveness of virtual reality as a tool for pro-environmental dietary change. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14315.
Plechatá, A, Morton, T, ..., & Makransky, G (2022b) Virtual reality intervention reduces dietary footprint: implications for environmental communication in the metaverse, n 1.
Polat, G (2013). 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin çevreye ilişkin bilişsel yapılarının kelime ilişkilendirme test tekniği ile tespiti [Determination of the cognitive structures of year secondary school students through word association test techniques]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(1), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed155
Queiroz, AC, Fauville, G, ..., & Bailenson, JN (2023). The efficacy of virtual reality in climate change education increases with amount of body movement and message specificity. Sustainability, 15(7), 5814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075814
Renzulli, JS, & Reis, SM (2014). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (3rd ed.) Prufrock Press.
Ronaghi, MH (2023). The effect of virtual reality technology and education on sustainable behavior: A comparative quasi-experimental study. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(4), 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2022-0025
Sanad, FS, Aljasim, FA, & AlHendal, HS (2021). The effect of an enrichment unit on climate change awareness and basic science process skills among gifted female primary school students. CCSE, 3(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.31559/CCSE2021.3.1.3
Saricam, H, & Sahin, SH (2015). The relationship between the environmental awareness, environmental attitude, curiosity and exploration in highly gifted students: Structural equation modelling. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1-2), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2015.412.1
Schroth, ST, & Helfer, JA (2017). Gifted & green: Sustainability/environmental science investigations that promote gifted children’s learning. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675903
Silverman, LK (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17(2), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553636
Sisk, DA (1982). Caring and sharing: Moral development of gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82(3), 221-229.
Slade, ML (2021). Global Citizenship as a Means for Teaching Environmental Education to Gifted Learners. In Building STEM Skills Through Environmental Education (pp 1-13). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2711-5.ch001
Soliman, M, Peetz, J, & Davydenko, M (2017). The impact of immersive technology on nature relatedness and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000213
Spangenberger, P, Geiger, SM, & Freytag, SC (2022). Becoming nature: Effects of embodying a tree in immersive virtual reality on nature relatedness. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1311. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05184-0
Stenberdt, VA, & Makransky, G (2023). Mastery experiences in immersive virtual reality promote pro-environmental waste-sorting behavior. Computers & Education, 198, 104760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104760
Sternberg, RJ (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
Subotnik, RF, & Jarvin, L (2005). Beyond expertise. Conceptions of giftedness, 343-357.
Suna, M, & Cengelci Köse, T (2023). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde sürdürülebilirlik bilinci kazandırmaya yönelik etkinliklerin öğrencilerin sürdürülebilir yaşama yönelik farkındalıklarına etkisi [The effect of activities for sustainability awareness on students' sustainable living awareness in the social studies course]. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY Journal), 7, 275-297. https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.609.11
Tekel, KY, & Yaman, Y (2023). Metaverse Risk Perceptions of Gifted Students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(4), 1035-1049. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2023.10.4.355
Thoma, SP, Hartmann, M, ..., & Weibel, D (2023). Increasing awareness of climate change with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 897034. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.897034
Tortop, HS (2007). The meaningful field trip of gifted students about renewable energy resources. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 12(1), 181-196.
Walshe, N (2008). Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802345958
Watters, J, & Diezmann, C (2003). The gifted student in science: Fulfilling potential. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 49(3), 46-53.
Worrell, FC, Subotnik, RF, ..., & Dixson, DD (2019). Gifted students. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 70, 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (9. Edition). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yu, Z, & Lin, X (2020). Impact of Environmental Education with VR Equipment on Learning Performance and Environmental Identity. In: Z Xu, … (eds) Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics. CSIA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1147. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43309-3_1
Yüzbaşıoğlu, MK (2023). Examining the impact of interdisciplinary Practices on secondary school students' awareness of sustainable living. Kastamonu Education Journal, 31(4), 590-599. https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2023-0067