Prevalence and predictors of educational neuromyths among teachers working with gifted students
Esra Kanlı - Ege University - ORCID
Abstract
Educational neuromyths—misconceptions about brain function and learning—continue to persist among educators despite advances in neuroscience and science communication. This study investigated the prevalence of such myths among 454 teachers working in Science and Art Centers (BILSEMs) across Turkey, which are specialized after-school programs for gifted learners. Participants completed a survey including 15 neuromyth statements and 15 scientifically accurate brain knowledge assertions, alongside questions about their background, self-assessed competence, and professional development experiences. Descriptive analyses revealed that over half of the participants endorsed seven or more neuromyths, with the most believed myths relating to learning styles, enriched environments, and hemispheric dominance. Other factors, including gender and teaching experience, were not significantly associated with the endorsement of neuromyths or the understanding of brain-related concepts. Multiple regression analyses indicated that greater knowledge about the brain does not necessarily reduce belief in neuromyths. Additionally, general brain knowledge was positively associated with reading popular science materials and self-perceived competence, while showing a weak negative association with teaching experience. These findings underscore the pressing need for targeted neuroscience literacy initiatives within teacher education programs, especially for educators working with gifted students, who are frequently believed to possess distinct neurological characteristics. Correcting these misconceptions is crucial for fostering the implementation of evidence-based practices in gifted education.
Keyword: Neuromyths in Education
Referencias
Ansari, D, Coch, D, & De Smedt, B (2011). Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00705.x
Ansari, D, De Smedt, B, & Grabner, RH (2012). Neuroeducation – a critical overview of an emerging field. Neuroethics, 5(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3
Blanchette Sarrasin, J, Riopel, M, & Masson, S (2019). Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12193
Canbulat, T, & Kiriktas, H (2017). Assessment of educational neuromyths among teachers and teacher candidates. Journal of Education and Learning 6, 326. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n2p326
Chrysikou, EG (2019). Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.014
Dekker, S, Lee, NC, Howard-Jones, P, & Jolles, J (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
Dündar, S, & Gündüz, N (2016). Misconceptions regarding the brain: The neuromyths of pre-service teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(4), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12119
Edelenbosch, R, Kupper, F, Krabbendam, L, & Broerse, JEW (2015). Brain-based learning and educational neuroscience: Boundary work. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12066
Ferrero, M, Garaizar, P, & Vadillo, MA (2016). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 496. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
Fischer, KW, Goswami, U, & Geake, J (2010). The future of educational neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01086.x
Geake, J (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802082518
Gleichgerrcht, E, Luttges, BL, Salvarezza, F, & Campos, AL (2015). Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12086
Goswami, U (2004). Neuroscience, education and special education. British Journal of Special Education, 31(4), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00352.x
Goswami, U (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1907
Grospietsch, F, & Lins, I (2021) Review on the prevalence and persistence of neuromyths in education – Where we stand and what is still needed. Frontiers in Education. 6:665752. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.665752
Grospietsch, F, & Mayer, J (2020). Misconceptions about neuroscience – prevalence and persistence of neuromyths in education. Neuroforum, 26(2), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1515/nf-2020-0006
Howard-Jones, PA (2008). Education and neuroscience. Educational Research, 50(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802082492
Howard-Jones, PA (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
Hughes, B, Sullivan, KA, & Gilmore, L (2022). Neuromyths about learning: Future directions from a critical review of a decade of research in school education. Prospects 52, 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09567-5
Karakus, O, Howard-Jones, PA, & Jay, T (2015). Primary and secondary school teachers' knowledge and misconceptions about the brain in Turkey. Proc. Soc. Behav. 174, 1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.858
Kayser, C (2007). Listening with your eyes. Scientific American Mind, 18(2), 24-29.
Lindell, AK, & Kidd, E (2011). Why right-brain teaching is half-witted: A critique of the misapplication of neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01120.x
Macdonald, K, Germine, L, ..., & McGrath, LM (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
McCabe, DP, & Castel, AD (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
Murphy, SM (2017). The promise and pitfalls of neuroeducation as a grounding for instructional practice.
Papadatou-Pastou, M, Haliou, E, & Vlachos, F (2017). Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804
Pasquinelli, E (2012). Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist? Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01141.x
Petitto, LA, & Dunbar, KN (2009). Educational neuroscience: new discoveries from bilingual brains, scientific brains, and the educated mind. Mind, brain and education: the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 3(4), 185.
Pickering, SJ, & Howard‐Jones, P (2007). Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00011.x
Rapp, DN (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416649347
Rato, JR, Abreu, AM, & Castro-Caldas, A (2013). Neuromyths in education: What is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers? Educational Research, 55(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.844947
Samuels, BM (2009). Can the differences between education and neuroscience be overcome by mind, brain, and education? Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01052.x
Singer, M (2013a). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495236
Singer, M (2013b). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495236
Singh, H, & O'Boyle, MW (2004). Interhemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology, 18(2), 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.2.371
Tardif, E, Doudin, PA, & Meylan, N (2015). Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12070
Tommerdahl, J (2010). A model for bridging the gap between neuroscience and education. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903518936
Torrijos-Muelas, M, González-Víllora, S, & Bodoque-Osma, AR (2021). The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 591923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
Varma, S, McCandliss, BD, & Schwartz, DL (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317687
van Dijk, W, & Lane, HB (2018). The brain and the US education system: Perpetuation of neuromyths. Exceptionality 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2018.1480954
Weisberg, DS, Keil, FC, ..., & Gray, JR (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 20(3), 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20040