PORTA LINGUARUM REFEREEING PROCESS

 

The refereeing process for the journal is 'double blind' and papers are assessed by the Reviewers and Scientific Committee against the criteria indicated in the following evaluation sheet:

 

PAPERS  EVALUATION  SHEET

 

PORTA LINGUARUM

Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras

Sede y dirección postal: Departamento de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, Facultad de CC. de la Educación de la Universidad de Granada,  Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Granada 18071.

Tel.: (34) 958 243965, Fax (34) 958 244187, Dirección URL: http://www.ugr.es/local/portalin

 E-mail: portalin@ugr.es  

 

We would be most grateful if, within two or three weeks, you submit the following evaluation to portalin@ugr.es.

Please see notes for contributors at www.ugr.es/local/portalin

 

Title (of the article): ….

Date: ....

 

Please tick where appropriate:

 

unacceptable

acceptable

good

excellent

Degree of relevance, originality, interest and suitability of the topic and content paper in relation to the journal scope and the field of foreign language didactics.

 

 

 

 

Content of the introduction: justification of the study, anticipation of aims and objectives.

 

 

 

 

Theoretical framework and literature review. Use of updated and relevant bibliography .

 

 

 

 

Formulation of hypothesis, objectives and/or research questions.

 

 

 

 

Description of the sample, the instruments and procedures for data collection, validity of the instruments used.

 

 

 

 

Data analysis and presentation of results. Critical comments. Scientific rigour and depth of analysis. Connection with theory and other studies.

 

 

 

 

Organisation of the contents and correct use of the language. Clarity, elegance and conciseness of style.

 

 

 

 

Clarity and relevance of the conclusions. Connection with the objectives and/or research questions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global assessment   (underline the suitable option)

 

acceptable                       acceptable pending revision                       unacceptable

 

Brief comments:

 

………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………

 

 

               LIST OF REVIEWERS