N	Concordance
1	ective study, 73 patients with abnormal mammography or palpable breast masses sc
2	  The advantages of digital over analog mammography as described by investigator
3	istory taking, clinical examination and mammography. Therefore, unless for the p
4	screening, randomized to receive annual mammography and clinical breast examinat
5	ations at a center for population-based mammography screening. During a 5-year p
6	reast and nodes together with bilateral mammography are standard procedures to e
7	percentage of recurrences detectable by mammography and the possibility of detec
8	5% sensitivity associated with combined mammography and physical examination and
9	mmography, MR imaging, and conventional mammography 2 weeks before fine-needle a
10	ood case for full-field, direct digital mammography systems and promote them as 
11	n when compared with modern screen-film mammography (SFM) systems. This paper de
12	ossible to combine direct magnification mammography with digital luminescence ra
13	signal behavior of contrast-enhanced MR mammography is not related to establishe
14	We recommend the use of a pre-operative mammography for all women over 50 years 
15	e of personal invitations for screening mammography to israeli women on a regula
16	aphy screening. Women who had undergone mammography perceived a higher level of 
17	 initial screen should be with two-view mammography and for second and subsequen