N	Concordance
1	nce of ET and NOs immunoreactivities in lymphatic vessel endothelium supports th
2	 findings indicate that the tumor is of lymphatic vessel type rather than blood 
3	ade, the absence of estrogen receptors, lymphatic vessel invasion, and the prese
4	mmatory injury of preexisting anomalous lymphatic vessels leading to onset or ag
5	ents and, accordingly, invasion of deep lymphatic vessels have to be considered.
6	siological traction forces. The ectatic lymphatic vessels in peripheral tissue m
7	, and morphologic changes of mesenteric lymphatic vessels (MLV) and lymph nodes 
8	face immediately entered the peritoneal lymphatic vessels and migrated to the pl
9	tic vessels and migrated to the pleural lymphatic vessels via the transmuscular 
10	5'-Nase) activity. The 5'-Nase-positive lymphatic vessels were seen predominantl
11	sual tubular lymphatic vessels. Several lymphatic vessels extended radially and 
12	n the pleural surface did not enter the lymphatic vessels, while those placed on
13	 cisterna chyli, or the retroperitoneal lymphatic vessels. The authors present c