Gramática inglesa
Notas a los temas
1. THE TEXT
Sentence grammar v. text grammar
Definitions of grammar
Syntax and morphology
Rules
Codifications of rules
Definitions of sentence and text/discourse
Sentence:
“largest stretch of language forming a syntactic construction”
(Huddleston 1984:18)
“…the limits of the English sentence are defined, in practice, wherever grammatical relations (such as those of subordination and coordination) cannot be established between clauses” (Quirk et al. 1985: 48)
text: A piece of naturally occurring spoken, written, or signed discourse identified for purposes of analysis. It is often a language unit with a definable communicative function, such as a conversation, a poster. (Crystal 1992:72)
discourse: A continuous stretch of (especially spoken) language larger than the sentence, often constituting a coherent unit, such as a sermon, argument, joke or narrative. (Crystal 1992:25)
text: a stretch of language interpreted formally, without context. (Cook 1989:158)
discourse: stretches of language perceived to be meaningful, unified, and purposive. (Cook 1989:156)
text: unit of communication seen as a coherent syntactic and semantic structure which can be spoken or written down. (Fowler 1986:85)
discourse: whole complicated process of linguistic interaction between people uttering and comprehending texts. (Fowler 1986:86)
text: the linguistic content of utterances: the stable semantic meanings of words, expressions and sentences... the "what is said" part of utterances (Schiffrin 1994:378-9)
discourse is utterances... Discourse is "above" (larger than) other units of language... [it] arises not as a collection of decontextualized units of language structure, but as a collection of inherently contextualized units of language use. (Schiffrin 1994:39)
Intra-sentence
connections -
inter-sentence connections
Sentence grammar: rules followed in word and sentence formation.
Text
grammar:
rules or rather principles by which sequences of words and sentences can be
combined into meaningful larger linguistic wholes. It transcends the boundaries
of the sentence. Sentences are dependent elements of texts. A TG should explain
the factors which determine both:
Choice
of sentences by communicants
Rules
of combination
Text
grammar: study of selection of texts available in a natural language.
External aspects of texts:
Factors/circumstances in an idealized communicative situation in which texts occur as spoken or written utterances.
Internal
aspects of texts:
Sets
of constituents in texts and ways in which constituents are selected by an
idealized encoder and combined into texts in actual text production.
Goals of Text-grammars:
-Explain
what
makes a text a text.
-Explain
how
texts fall into distinct groupings on account of dominant types of
internal constitution (Text type, group, form).
-Isolate
and specify constituents from which communicants can choose (Varieties).
1.1 TEXT UNITS
Sentences
Substance:
Short, medium, long sentences: tone-groups without/ with pauses, stops and
commas.
Form:
S P (O) (C) (A)
Paragraphs
Substance: speech paragraphs (prosody), printed paragraphs
Form: base paragraph initiator - base sentence - bit sentence (base terminators)
Text
form
Text:
extended structure of syntactic units such as words, groups and clauses and
textual units marked by both coherence and completion.
Thematic
text base:
a text initial linguistic unit which both structurally and semantically permits
expansion into text by sequences of coherence and completed linguistic units.
Typically: headlines.
-simple
phenomenon-registering sentence with be/intensive, stative verb (seem, contain)
present
or past tense
Thousands of glasses were on the tables
Narrative
text base:
-simple
action recording sentence with dynamic verb in the past tense and Aplace + time
The
passengers landed in New York in the middle of the night
Expository
text base
-simple
phenomenon-identifying sentence with be [present] and a NP as C for synthetic
exposition
One
part of the brain is the cortex or rind
-simple
phenomenon-linking sentence with have [present] and a NP as C
The brain has ten million neurones
Argumentative
text base
-simple
quality-attributing sentence with negated be [pres] and an AdjP as C
The obsession with durability in the arts is not permanent
Instructive text base
-action-demanding
sentence
Don't move
TASK: Choose five texts from various sources and find their text bases. Do they fit into Werlich's typology?
FEATURES
OF TEXTS
Coherence:
created when a text base unit is expanded in linear progression in ordered and
completed sequences of linguistic units.
Thematic
expansion:
-functional sequences
-topical sequences
Completion:
signals which indicate both the beginning and end of one or more of the
sequences that have established coherence.
Text
and context
Texts
can be viewed as one of several factors interrelated in an inclusive context.
Context refers to all situational factors (such as persons with intentions,
reactions, presuppositions and status, objects, relations, etc.) and
socio-historical circumstances in the non-verbal environment that lies inside
and outside the area of sense perception shared by communicants.
Links text-context:
(1)
fictional and non fictional texts
(2) identification of illocutionary function
Correlations
between texts and context
text | focus | cognitive process |
descriptive | phenomena
in space |
perceptions
in space |
narrative | factual/conceptual phenomena in time | perceptions
in time |
expository |
analysis & synthesis of concepts |
comprehension
|
argumentative | relations between concepts | judging |
instructive | future behavior | planning |
REFERENCES
Cook, G. (1989) Discourse, Oxford: O.U.P.
Crystal, D. (1992) Introducing Linguistics, London: Penguin
Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism, Oxford/New York: O.U.P.
Huddleston, R. (1984) An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Quirk, R. et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (USA): Blackwell
1.2 COHESION AND COHERENCE
Cohesion, communication and cognition
Open-ness of texts: lack of elements needed for comprehension
reference to reality completed with world knowledge
integration of textual elements into general meaning
TEXT |
|||
coherence |
external reference |
internal relations |
cohesion |
top-down |
direction of strategies |
bottom-up |
|
inference |
product of strategies |
integration |
(1)Once
upon a sunny morning, a man...
The man... he said.
What
is the meaning of the cohesive relation between a
man and he? The meaning is that
they refer to the same thing.
The man
is also functioning cohesively by the repetition of “man” and the
accompanying “the” as anaphoric signal. (cf. None but the brave deserve the
fair)
COHESION = the interpretation of some element is dependent on that of another. The one PRESUPPOSES the other, i.e., it cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it.
TIES
= single instances of cohesion
COHESION IS A SEMANTIC RELATION:
partly expressed through grammar (reference, substitution, ellipsis)
conjunction (partly grammatical/partly lexical)
partly expressed through the vocabulary (lexical cohesion)
A
TEXT IS NOT A STRUCTURAL UNIT:
cohesion is not a structural relation (cf. S + P). The parts of a sentence
cohere with each other by virtue of structure:
(2)
A man
who sat in a breakfast nook looked up from his scrambled eggs to see a white
unicorn.
Any
unit which is structured hangs together so as to form text. All grammatical
units (sentences, groups, words) are internally cohesive simply because they are
structured.
STRUCTURE IS ONE MEANS OF EXPRESSING TEXTURE
Since
cohesive relations are not concerned with structure, they may be found just as
well within a sentence as between sentences. They have in principle nothing to
do with sentence boundaries. However, because it is the unit of grammatical
structure, the sentence tends to determine the way in which cohesion is
expressed:
(3)*John
took John’s hat off and hung John’s hat on a peg.
REFERENCE:
affected by syntactic rules
SUBSTITUTION,
ELLIPSIS & LEXICAL COHESION: unaffected by the sentence structure
CONJUNCTION: associated with grammatical structure:
(4) It's raining. Let's stay home.
(4a)
Since it is raining, let's stay home.
We
cannot show that there is any functional relation between two sentences in (1)
in the sample text such that the two form a configuration of mutually defining
structural roles. Whereas within the sentence we can specify a limited number of
possible structures (modification, subordination, etc.).
TEXTURE
= one element is interpreted by reference to another.
(5)He
said so.
We can decode it but we cannot INTERPRET it. (cf. John
said everything)
ANAPHORA
= The simplest form of cohesion. The presupposed element is verbally
explicit and is found in the immediately preceding sentence:
(7)The
man awoke his wife. She opened an unfriendly eye
CATAPHORA
= The presupposition goes in the opposite direction, with the presupposed
element following:
(8)This
is how to get the best results. Plant the seeds in March
EXOPHORIC
REFERENCE = The information required for interpreting some element in the
text is not to be found in the text at all but in the situation.
(9)Did
you plant those seeds?
COHESION IN THE SYSTEM: Set of possibilities that exist in the language for making a text hang together
COHESION IN THE TEXT: A text unfolds in real time, hence of the two elements embodying the cohesive relation, one always follows the other
Implicitly
anaphoric: John (1)... ...John(2)
Explicitly
anaphoric: John... ... :he
(Explicitly)
cataphoric: he:...
... John
TEXT
AND SITUATION
Interpretation
of language draws upon two kinds of evidence:
external
(coherence): situational clues
internal
(cohesion): linguistic clues
The
internal and external aspects of texture are not wholly separable.
The
situation, meaning the context of situation in which a text is embedded, refers
to all those extra-linguistic factors which have a bearing on the text itself.
The question is, what are the external factors affecting the linguistic choices
that the speaker or writer makes. For Halliday:
FIELD
OF DISCOURSE: total event, purposive
activity of addresser, subject-matter
MODE
OF DISCOURSE: function of text in event, channel: spoken/written
TENOR OF DISCOURSE: role of interaction, relations
Personal
reference, demonstrative reference, comparative reference
Reference:
semantic (relation between meanings)
“he”:
“some person, male, other than speaker or addressee, identifiable in
environment.” (endophoric/exophoric)
-Grammatical
function of reference item may be different from referent: class not necessarily
preserved.
(10)
John’s
house is beautiful. He had it built last year.
-Anaphoric,
cataphoric, exophoric
-Non-verbal.
-Semantic
definition.
-Total
referential identity
-Replacement
not necessarily possible
Replacement of one item by another
Ellipsis
= omission of an item = replacement by nothing
Substitution (ellipsis): grammatical (relation between words and phrases)
(11)
My axe is too blunt. I must get a sharper one (= structural
function)
(12)
You think Joan already knows? I think everybody does.
(13)
Has she left? I think so. (= clause of reported speech)
-Anaphoric.
-Textual
(endophoric).
-Class
necessarily preserved
-Replacement
possible
-Grammatical
definition:
Nominal:
one, ones, same
Verbal:
do
Clausal:
so, not
NOMINAL
SUBSTITUTION
One,
ones: head of NP
-Not
necessarily same clause function: If I use leaden ones his hide is sure to
flatten them.
-[Ncount]
Get some fresh ones (= biscuits) /Get some fresh (bread)
-Substitutions of Head only, not modifiers:
(14) We have no coal fires; only wood ones.
REPUDIATION:
In any anaphoric context, something is carried over from a previous instance.
What is carried over may be the whole of what there was, or it may be only a
part of it; and if it is only a part of it, then the remainder, that which it is
not carried over, has to be repudiated.
-Nominal
substitution: redefinition
-Carrier
accompanied by some defining modifier
-One
can never substitute a proper noun (=fully defined)
a)
this (new) (one) (with wheels)
b)
the (new) (one) (with wheels)
c)
(a) (new) (one) (with wheels)
THE
SAME presupposes an entire nominal group including any modifying elements,
except such as are explicitly repudiated.
(15) -I want a Quarter-Pounder with cheese.
-I’ll have the same
VERBAL
SUBSTITUTION
Do
= Head of a verbal
group = lexical verb
(16)
He does not behave as he used to do
CLAUSAL
SUBSTITUTION
So,
not
(17)
You know what they are like. -I believe so. (CLAUSAL)
(18)The
children work very hard in the garden. They must do (VERBAL SUBSTITUTION)
ELLIPSIS
= SUBSTITUTION BY Ø
Something
left unsaid but understood in TEXT
SENTENCES
whose structure is such as to presuppose some preceding item. Structural slot.
(19)
Joan brought some carnations, and Catherine Ø some sweet peas.
-Presupposition
in the structure: incompleteness (found in preceding text = anaphoric)
(20)This
is a fine hall you have here. I’m proud to be lecturing in it (REFERENCE)
I’ve
never lectured in a finer one (SUBSTITUTION)
I’ve
never lectured in a finer (ELLIPSIS)
NOMINAL
ELLIPSIS
Deictic
+ numerative + epithet + classifier + H + qualifier
(21)Those
(two) ( electric) ( trains) (with pantographs)
VERBAL ELLIPSIS
Tense
+ mood + phase + aspect + voice
(22)
Have you been swimming? Yes, I have. (auxiliary + lexical v.)
(23)
What have you been doing? Swimming. (operator)
(24)
Has
he sold his collection? He has some of the paintings
CLAUSAL
ELLIPSIS
(25)
What was the new manager going to do? Fire the employee
CONJUNCTION
CONJUNCTION
is non simply an anaphoric relation.
CONJUNCTIVE
elements are cohesive INDIRECTLY:
meanings which presuppose the presence of other components in the discourse.
CONJUNCTIVE
RELATIONS = very general relations that may be associated with different threads
of meaning
(26)
a.
A snowstorm
followed the battle (The battle was followed by a snowstorm)
b.
After the
battle, there was a snowstorm
c.
After
they had fought a battle, it snowed
d.
They fought a battle. Afterwards, it
snowed
TYPES
OF CONJUNCTION
(27) For
the whole day he climbed up the mountainside.
And
in all this time he met no one (Additive)
Yet,
he was hardly aware of being tired (adversative)
So
by night time the valley was far below him (causal)
Then,
as dusk fell, he sat down to rest (temporal)
EXTERNAL:
relations between external phenomena
INTERNAL:
to the communicative situation
LEXICAL
COHESION
TYPES OF LEXICAL COHESION
same word (repetition)
synonym (near-synonym): ascent-climb
superordinate: car-Jaguar
general nouns: people, creature, thing, stuff
COLLOCATION: boy-girl, dollar-cent, basement-roof
REFERENTIAL RELATION
inclusive
exclusive
unrelated
(28)
There’s a boy climbing that tree
The
boy’s going to fall if he doesn’t take care
Those
boys are always getting into mischief
And
there’s another boy standing underneath
Most boys love climbing trees (¿?)
REFERENCES:
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman
2. THEMATIC AND INFORMATION STRUCTURES
Clause as message: thematic structures
Organization of informational content:
THEME: point of departure
RHEME: rest of the message
Jeeves |
brought Bingo a cup of tea at 8 a.m. |
theme |
rheme |
variants:
Bingo | was brought a cup of tea by Jeeves at 8 a.m. |
A cup of tea | was brought to Bingo at 8 a.m. by Jeeves |
A cup of tea | Jeeves brought Bingo at 8 a.m. |
A cup of tea | Jeeves brought it to Bingo at 8 a.m. |
At 8 a.m. | Bingo was brought a cup of tea by Jeeves |
At 8 a.m. | a cup of tea was brought to Bingo by Jeeves |
theme |
rheme |
The motivation for these variants is not to be sought in the clause in isolation, but in its relationship to that part of the discourse at which it is located. The speaker organizes the content of the clause in order to establish the point of departure of the clausal message and to highlight that constituent which is presented as New information, usually at the end of the clause.
2.1 THE CONCEPTS OF "THEME"/"RHEME", "GIVEN"/"NEW"
Processibility principle (Leech 1983): the text should be presented in a manner which makes it easy for the hearer to decode in time.
End-focus: this maxim recommends that if the rules of language allow it, the part of the clause which contains new information should be placed at the end (tone-units)
End-weight: in a syntactic structure less complex constituents precede more complex ones. Hence the characteristic English sentence has a predominance of right-branching over left-branching.
(2)That the President will resign is on the cards
(2a)It
is on the cards that the President will resign
CLAUSE AS MESSAGE
Conventionally, speakers begin their utterances with given information and keep new information till the end. In fact given and new isolate the two poles of communicative dynamism.
given/new --- theme/focus.
Given and new: extra-linguistic
Theme and focus (rheme): linguistically defined (position and prosody)
THEME:
-the
first part is given
-it
supplements the basis on which new information is predicated
-an
existential presupposition holds for the object that the topic expression
refers to
-the
content of the topic expression is enough for the identification of the object
of reference
FOCUS:
-indicates
where the new information lies
-occurs
on the last appropriate syllable (prominent semantic unit)
An
illustration
Let's
imagine that a speaker (S) and some fellow-diners have ordered some dishes in
a restaurant. The waiter has returned with the dishes for both S and S's
fellow-diners. At this point S might say either
(a)Mine
is the beef
Wellington, or
(b)The
beef Wellington
is mine
Although
they have the same sense, these two utterances would be approprirate to
different contexts: (a) would be appropriate where the waiter was trying to
remember which dish S had ordered (as contrasted with what others had
ordered); (b) would be appropriate where the waiter was carrying the beef
Wellington, and trying to remember to whom that dish should be given. More
generally (a) would be appropriate where "mine" (the fact of
identifying S as the recipient) was given information, and "the beef
Wellington" was new information; whereas (b) would be appropriate where the
given-new relations were reversed. One may assume that each utterance would be
pronounced with the nucleus as indicated here:
(a)Mine
is the beef WÈLLINGTON
(b)The beef Wellington is MÌNE
2.2
SYNTACTIC STRATEGIES IN ASSIGNING FOCUS
(i)Inversion
reversal of subject and verb
reversal
of subject and operator
The fronting of A and Cs in intensive patterns naturally carries V-S inversion so that there is no nuclear focus on the verb:
(3) Here's the post
(4)
Never
has it been cheaper to go to the Caribean Islands
(ii)fronting
the
achievement of marked theme by moving into initial position an item which
otherwise is unusual there.
(5)
Fool Joe may be, but thief he is not
(iii)cleft
and pseudo-cleft sentences
Division
of a sentence into two with their own verbs:
(6)
Serbian troops violated the
cease-fire
(6a)It
is the Servian troops that violated the cease-fire
(6b)It
is the cease-fire that the Servian troops violated
(6c)What
the Serbian troops violated is the ceased-fire
a)
and b) are cleft sentences while c) is pseudo-cleft.
(iv)postponement
The
passive, together with other lexical and grammatical devices, are other
procedures to change the focus of a sentence:
(7)Without
a prescription you cannot buy this drug
(7a)Without
a prescription this drug is not sold
(v)extraposition
In
extraposition we combine postponement with substitution. It operates almost
exclusively on subordinate nominal clauses, especially with clausal subject:
(8)
It is a nuIsance that banks are
closed on Saturdays
(vi)existential
"there"
Existential
clauses are introduced by there
followed by BE + NP (occasionally seem,
appear, arise):
(9)
There
was a dreadful accident yesterday
Syntactically, the NP is the notional subject which has been transferred to the position after the verb, a position usually occupied by a complement. The NP represents new information and for this reason it is usually indefinite.
Factors
in the choice of alternative wordings
Which element represents the TOPIC: what the clause is about
Which part of the message the SPEAKER considers most important.
Which part of the message S treats as known and which is presented as new
What information is presupposed at a given point
Which element S chooses as the point of departure: THEME
THEME
-Signal
to direct H's
expectations
-S=s
assumptions about H's
knowledge.
-Cohesion.
THEMES
(continuative, conjunctive, modal, relational, vocative) + REPRESENTATIONAL
THEMATIC CONNECTION
TEXTS: - external connections
- internal connections: CHAIN: known --- unknown
[1] Mary invited me to her BÌRTHDAY party/ It was held in a West End HOTEL/ where I met her PARENTS/ The father is a retired DENTIST.
THEMATIC
UNIT --- PROSODIC CLIMAX
Non-linear
connection:
[2]
Mr Fraser (1) sent for the doctor (2); he (1) listened anxiously for his (2)
arrival; he (1) asked him (2) to examine his (1) throat.
Extra-textual
connection:
[3]
The police (1) prohibited the strikers (2) from demonstrating because
-they
(1) anticipated violence
-they
(2) advocated violence
[4]
Caroline arrived on Tuesday and Roger finished his thesis on Friday.
DISCOURSE STRATEGIES
STEP:
step by step (instructional)
[5]The
100metre race was run immediately after luch. This was followed by the 400metre
relay. After a brief interlude with an acrobatic display, spectators...
CHAIN:
definite links by direction may be curve, the course double back and the
ultimate point unpredictable.
[6]
The narrow bridges, slats missing, are considered by the natives hereabouts to
be dangerous, fit only for carefree boys to fish off. They rarely catch any
fish, according to Old Cash at the general store. What crackers he has!
STACK:
Predetermined unit but no linear progression, instead we find like a
vertical structure with a sound foundation (topic sentence), an accumulation of
layers, finally capped by a roof.
[7]
There is something very unsatisfactory about the maxim “Honesty is the best
policy”. It seems to equate virtue with profit, yet our common experience
denies this. We could all cite instances of where an honest and virtuous action
has brought disappointment and even ruin.
BALANCE:
plus and minus, hot and cold, reflective, exploratory discourse
[8]
For a spring break, Cumbria is hard to beat. There is of course a strong risk of
bad weather during the early months of the year. On the other hand, the early
tourist is rewarded by empty roads and the feeling that he has the countryside
to himself. Not all the hotels are open, it is true, and you may be obliged to
drive on to the next village. But this is well offset by the welcome that awaits
you...
References:
Downing,
A. & P.Locke (1992) A University
Course in English Grammar, London: Prentice Hall
Leech,
G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics,
London: Longman.
Quirk, R. et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
3. FROM TEXT TO DISCOURSE
RULES & PRINCIPLES: SEMANTICS & PRAGMATICS
Meaning:
What does X mean? semantics
What did you mean by X? pragmatics
Pragmatics: study of meaning in relation to speech situations
PRINCIPLES (e.g., the cooperative principle)
-apply variably to different contexts of language use
-apply in variable degrees
-can conflict with one another
-can be contravened without abnegation of the activity they control
TASK: Compare this features of pragmatic principles and consider their counterparts in grammatical rules.
# 1. GRAMMAR IS RULE GOVERNED - PRAGMATICS IS PRINCIPLE GOVERNED
e.g. passive: rules (sets of changes, how it is formed); principles (end-focus, preference)
# 2. RULES OF GRAMMAR ARE CONVENTIONAL - PRINCIPLES OF PRAGMATICS ARE NON-CONVENTIONAL
e.g. I'll pay you back tomorrow (sense & force)
# 3 GENERAL PRAGMATICS RELATES SENSE TO FORCE
# 4 GRAMMATICAL EXPLANATIONS ARE FORMAL - PRAGMATIC EXPLANATIONS ARE FUNCTIONAL
# 5 GRAMMAR IS IDEATIONAL - PRAGMATICS IS INTERPERSONAL AND TEXTUAL
DEFINITIONS OF DISCOURSE
STRUCTURAL: unit above the sentence
FUNCTIONAL: focus on language use
paradigms | structural | functional |
-lang. as grammar -priority of code -referential function -arbitrary elements -homogeneous code -lang. as mental phen. -universals -acquisition: capacity -autonomous system |
-lang. as speech -priority of use -social functions -appropriate elements -speech communities -lang. as social phen. -uses -acquisition: deveopment -social function |
|
assumptions |
-independence of functions |
-influence of functions |
FORMALIST DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE
-Language above the sentence
-Structure and units
-Structural analyses: constituents - relationships - arrangements
PROBLEMS:
-sentence as unit: written lang./spoken lang.
-"independent form with structural dependence"
-discourse ~ structure
TASK: Examine the following piece of discourse and consider (i) How do we identify (A) as a question? and (ii) What is the background knowledge?
(A) Are you free for lunch today?
(B) I have to advise students all day.
FUNCTIONAL DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE
-Language in use: purpose and function
-System through which particular functions are realized
-Functional analyses:
functions served by a system
how particular units are used
intended communicative force
display of social identity
transmission of information
PROBLEMS
-speech acts are analyzed at sentence level
DISCOURSE AS UTTERANCES
Data: collection of inherently contextualized units of language use.
Utterance: context-bound realization of sentences
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
SEQUENTIAL GOALS: principles underlying the order of utterances
SEMANTIC/PRAGMATIC GOALS: relate organization and meaning of expressions to formulation and interpretation of content
DISCOURSE AND COMMUNICATION
Aspects of communication:
participants (sender, speaker, receiver, hearer)
message (thoughts, intentions)
medium (code dependent, context dependent)
inter-subjectivity (shared knowledge)
(A) CODE MODEL
COMMUNICATION: TRANSMISSION OF THOUGHTS
INTER-SUBJECTIVITY: shared code
SENDER has THOUGHTS which are transformed into SIGNALS and TRANSMITTED to the intended recipient
MESSAGE: thoughts.
(B) INFERENTIAL MODEL
COMMUNICATION: DISPLAY INTENTIONS
-achievement of inter-subjectivity
-recipient mirrors sender
-prior knowledge
INTENTIONS: referential information (propositional) + expressive, social information (non-propositional)
SHARED CODE + SHARED PRINCIPLES
(C) INTERACTIONAL MODEL
COMMUNICATION: INTENTIONAL + NON-INTENTIONAL BEHAVIOR: DISPLAY INFORMATION
Recipient achievement of an interpretation of displayed information
INFORMATION IS GIVEN AND GIVEN OFF
ROLES: INITIATOR - RECIPIENT
e.g.,
A -Hi!
B -Hi!
(A) Greeting signal
(B) Recognized intention to greet
(C) Hi1 response to situation itself: mutual access, informal, prior contact
Hi2 same as Hi1; or response to situation created
REFERENCES
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (USA): Blackwell