Gramática inglesa 

 Notas a los temas


1. THE TEXT

Sentence grammar v. text grammar

Intra-sentence connections - inter-sentence connections

Text grammar v. discourse analysis

 

Sentence grammar: rules followed in word and sentence formation.

Text grammar: rules or rather principles by which sequences of words and sentences can be combined into meaningful larger linguistic wholes. It transcends the boundaries of the sentence. Sentences are dependent elements of texts. A TG should explain the factors which determine both:

Text grammar: study of selection of texts available in a natural language.

 

External aspects of texts:

Factors/circumstances in an idealized communicative situation in which texts occur as spoken or written utterances.

Internal aspects of texts:

Sets of constituents in texts and ways in which constituents are selected by an idealized encoder and combined into texts in actual text production.

Goals of Text-grammars: 

-Explain what makes a text a text.

-Explain how texts fall into distinct groupings on account of dominant types of  internal constitution (Text type, group, form).

-Isolate and specify constituents from which communicants can choose (Varieties).

   

1.1 TEXT UNITS

Sentences

Substance: Short, medium, long sentences: tone-groups without/ with pauses, stops and commas.

Form: S P (O) (C) (A)

Paragraphs

Substance: speech paragraphs (prosody), printed paragraphs

Form: base paragraph initiator - base sentence - bit sentence (base terminators)

 

Text form

Text: extended structure of syntactic units such as words, groups and clauses and textual units marked by both coherence and completion.

 

Thematic text base: a text initial linguistic unit which both structurally and semantically permits expansion into text by sequences of coherence and completed linguistic units. Typically: headlines.

 

Descriptive text base:

-simple phenomenon-registering sentence with be/intensive, stative verb (seem, contain)

present or past tense  

Thousands of glasses were on the tables

 

Narrative text base:

-simple action recording sentence with dynamic verb in the past tense and Aplace + time

The passengers landed in New York in the middle of the night

 

Expository text base

-simple phenomenon-identifying sentence with be [present] and a NP as C for synthetic exposition

One part of the brain is the cortex or rind

-simple phenomenon-linking sentence with have [present] and a NP as C  

The brain has ten million neurones

 

Argumentative text base 

-simple quality-attributing sentence with negated be [pres] and an AdjP as C  

The obsession with durability in the arts is not permanent

 

Instructive text base

-action-demanding sentence  

Don't move

 

TASK: Choose five texts from various sources and find their text bases. Do they fit into Werlich's typology?

 

FEATURES OF TEXTS 

Coherence: created when a text base unit is expanded in linear progression in ordered and completed sequences of linguistic units.

Thematic expansion:  

-functional sequences

-topical sequences

 

Completion: signals which indicate both the beginning and end of one or more of the sequences that have established coherence.

 

  Text and context

Texts can be viewed as one of several factors interrelated in an inclusive context. Context refers to all situational factors (such as persons with intentions, reactions, presuppositions and status, objects, relations, etc.) and socio-historical circumstances in the non-verbal environment that lies inside and outside the area of sense perception shared by communicants.

 

Links text-context:           

(1) fictional and non fictional texts

(2) identification of illocutionary function

 

Correlations between texts and context  

 

text focus cognitive process
descriptive phenomena  in space   perceptions in space  
narrative factual/conceptual phenomena in time  perceptions in time  
expository  

analysis &

synthesis of concepts

comprehension  
argumentative relations between concepts judging
instructive future behavior planning

 

REFERENCES

Cook, G. (1989) Discourse, Oxford: O.U.P.

Crystal, D. (1992) Introducing Linguistics, London: Penguin

Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism, Oxford/New York: O.U.P.

Huddleston, R. (1984) An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: C.U.P.

Quirk, R. et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman

Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (USA): Blackwell


 

1.2 COHESION AND COHERENCE

TEXT

coherence 

external

reference

internal

relations 

cohesion

top-down

direction of strategies

bottom-up

inference

product of strategies

integration

 

(1)Once upon a sunny morning, a man... The man... he said.

 

What is the meaning of the cohesive relation between a man and he? The meaning is that they refer to the same thing. The man is also functioning cohesively by the repetition of “man” and the accompanying “the” as anaphoric signal. (cf. None but the brave deserve the fair)

COHESION = the interpretation of some element is dependent on that of another. The one PRESUPPOSES the other, i.e., it cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it.

TIES = single instances of cohesion

 (2) A man who sat in a breakfast nook looked up from his scrambled eggs to see a white unicorn.

Any unit which is structured hangs together so as to form text. All grammatical units (sentences, groups, words) are internally cohesive simply because they are structured.

Since cohesive relations are not concerned with structure, they may be found just as well within a sentence as between sentences. They have in principle nothing to do with sentence boundaries. However, because it is the unit of grammatical structure, the sentence tends to determine the way in which cohesion is expressed:

(3)*John took John’s hat off and hung John’s hat on a peg.

 

REFERENCE: affected by syntactic rules

SUBSTITUTION, ELLIPSIS & LEXICAL COHESION: unaffected by the sentence structure CONJUNCTION: associated with grammatical structure:

(4) It's raining. Let's stay home.

(4a) Since it is raining, let's stay home.

We cannot show that there is any functional relation between two sentences in (1) in the sample text such that the two form a configuration of mutually defining structural roles. Whereas within the sentence we can specify a limited number of possible structures (modification, subordination, etc.).

 (5)He said so. We can decode it but we cannot INTERPRET it. (cf. John said everything)

(7)The man awoke his wife. She opened an unfriendly eye

 (8)This is how to get the best results. Plant the seeds in March

 (9)Did you plant those seeds?

Implicitly anaphoric: John (1)... ...John(2)

Explicitly anaphoric: John... ... :he

(Explicitly) cataphoric: he:... ... John

 

Interpretation of language draws upon two kinds of evidence:

external (coherence): situational clues

internal (cohesion): linguistic clues

The internal and external aspects of texture are not wholly separable.

The situation, meaning the context of situation in which a text is embedded, refers to all those extra-linguistic factors which have a bearing on the text itself. The question is, what are the external factors affecting the linguistic choices that the speaker or writer makes. For Halliday:

FIELD OF DISCOURSE: total event, purposive activity of addresser, subject-matter

MODE OF DISCOURSE: function of text in event, channel: spoken/written

TENOR OF DISCOURSE: role of interaction, relations

 

REFERENCE

Personal reference, demonstrative reference, comparative reference

Reference: semantic (relation between meanings)

“he”: “some person, male, other than speaker or addressee, identifiable in environment.” (endophoric/exophoric)

-Grammatical function of reference item may be different from referent: class not necessarily preserved.

 

(10) John’s house is beautiful. He had it built last year.

-Anaphoric, cataphoric, exophoric

-Non-verbal.

-Semantic definition.

-Total referential identity

-Replacement not necessarily possible

 

SUBSTITUTION

Replacement of one item by another

Ellipsis = omission of an item = replacement by nothing

Substitution (ellipsis):  grammatical (relation between words and phrases)

(11) My axe is too blunt. I must get a sharper one (= structural function)

(12) You think Joan already knows? I think everybody does.

(13) Has she left? I think so. (= clause of reported speech)

 

-Anaphoric.

-Textual (endophoric).

-Class necessarily preserved

-Replacement possible

-Grammatical definition:

Nominal:  one, ones, same

Verbal:    do

Clausal:   so, not

 

NOMINAL SUBSTITUTION

One, ones: head of NP

-Not necessarily same clause function: If I use leaden ones his hide is sure to flatten them.

-[Ncount] Get some fresh ones (= biscuits) /Get some fresh (bread)

-Substitutions of  Head only, not modifiers:

(14) We have no coal fires; only wood ones.

REPUDIATION: In any anaphoric context, something is carried over from a previous instance. What is carried over may be the whole of what there was, or it may be only a part of it; and if it is only a part of it, then the remainder, that which it is not carried over, has to be repudiated.

-Nominal substitution:  redefinition

-Carrier accompanied by some defining modifier

-One can never substitute a proper noun (=fully defined)

a) this (new) (one) (with wheels)

b) the (new) (one) (with wheels)

c) (a) (new) (one) (with wheels)

THE SAME presupposes an entire nominal group including any modifying elements, except such as are explicitly repudiated.

(15)    -I want a Quarter-Pounder with cheese.

            -I’ll have the same

 

VERBAL SUBSTITUTION

Do = Head of a verbal group = lexical verb

(16) He does not behave as he used to do

 

CLAUSAL SUBSTITUTION

So, not

(17) You know what they are like. -I believe so. (CLAUSAL)

(18)The children work very hard in the garden. They must do (VERBAL SUBSTITUTION)

 

ELLIPSIS

ELLIPSIS = SUBSTITUTION BY Ø

Something left unsaid but understood in TEXT

SENTENCES whose structure is such as to presuppose some preceding item. Structural slot.

(19) Joan brought some carnations, and Catherine Ø some sweet peas.

 

-Presupposition in the structure: incompleteness (found in preceding text = anaphoric)

 

(20)This is a fine hall you have here. I’m proud to be lecturing in it (REFERENCE)

I’ve never lectured in a finer one (SUBSTITUTION)

I’ve never lectured in a finer (ELLIPSIS)

 

NOMINAL ELLIPSIS

Deictic + numerative + epithet + classifier + H + qualifier

(21)Those (two) ( electric) ( trains) (with pantographs)

 

VERBAL ELLIPSIS

Tense + mood + phase + aspect + voice

(22) Have you been swimming? Yes, I have. (auxiliary + lexical v.)

(23) What have you been doing? Swimming. (operator)

(24) Has he sold his collection? He has some of the paintings

 

CLAUSAL ELLIPSIS

(25) What was the new manager going to do? Fire the employee

 

CONJUNCTION

CONJUNCTION is non simply an anaphoric relation.

CONJUNCTIVE elements are cohesive INDIRECTLY:  meanings which presuppose the presence of other components in the discourse.

 

CONJUNCTIVE RELATIONS = very general relations that may be associated with different threads of meaning

 

(26)

a. A snowstorm followed the battle (The battle was followed by a snowstorm)

b. After the battle, there was a snowstorm

c. After they had fought a battle, it snowed

d. They fought a battle. Afterwards, it snowed

 

TYPES OF CONJUNCTION

(27) For the whole day he climbed up the mountainside.

And in all this time he met no one (Additive)

Yet, he was hardly aware of being tired (adversative)

So by night time the valley was far below him (causal)

Then, as dusk fell, he sat down to rest (temporal)

 

EXTERNAL: relations between external phenomena

INTERNAL: to the communicative situation

LEXICAL COHESION

(28) There’s a boy climbing that tree

The boy’s going to fall if he doesn’t take care

Those boys are always getting into mischief

And there’s another boy standing underneath

Most boys love climbing trees (¿?)

 

REFERENCES:

Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman


 

2. THEMATIC AND INFORMATION STRUCTURES

Clause as message: thematic structures

Organization of informational content:

THEME: point of departure

RHEME: rest of the message

(1)

Jeeves

brought Bingo a cup of tea at 8 a.m.

theme

rheme

variants:

Bingo was brought a cup of tea by Jeeves at 8 a.m.
A cup of tea was brought to Bingo at 8 a.m. by Jeeves
A cup of tea Jeeves brought Bingo at 8 a.m.
A cup of tea Jeeves brought it to Bingo at 8 a.m.
At 8 a.m. Bingo was brought a cup of tea by Jeeves
At 8 a.m. a cup of tea was brought to Bingo by Jeeves

theme

rheme

The motivation for these variants is not to be sought in the clause in isolation, but in its relationship to that part of the discourse at which it is located. The speaker organizes the content of the clause in order to establish the point of departure of the clausal message and to highlight that constituent which is presented as New information, usually at the end of the clause. 

 

2.1 THE CONCEPTS OF "THEME"/"RHEME", "GIVEN"/"NEW"

Processibility principle (Leech 1983):  the text should be presented in a manner which makes it easy for the hearer to decode in time. 

  End-focus: this maxim recommends that if the rules of language allow it, the part of the clause which contains new information should be placed at the end (tone-units)

End-weight: in a syntactic structure less complex constituents precede more complex ones. Hence the characteristic English sentence has a predominance of right-branching over left-branching.

(2)That the President will resign is on the cards

(2a)It is on the cards that the President will resign

 

CLAUSE AS MESSAGE

Conventionally, speakers begin their utterances with given information and keep new information till the end. In fact given and new isolate the two poles of communicative dynamism

given/new --- theme/focus.

Given and new:  extra-linguistic

Theme and focus (rheme): linguistically defined (position and prosody)

 

THEME:

-the first part is given

-it supplements the basis on which new information is predicated

-an existential presupposition holds for the object that the topic expression refers to

-the content of the topic expression is enough for the identification of the object of reference

 

FOCUS:

-indicates where the new information lies

-occurs on the last appropriate syllable (prominent semantic unit)

 

An illustration

Let's imagine that a speaker (S) and some fellow-diners have ordered some dishes in a restaurant. The waiter has returned with the dishes for both S and S's fellow-diners. At this point S might say either

(a)Mine is the beef Wellington, or

(b)The beef Wellington is mine

Although they have the same sense, these two utterances would be approprirate to different contexts: (a) would be appropriate where the waiter was trying to remember which dish S had ordered (as contrasted with what others had ordered); (b) would be appropriate where the waiter was carrying the beef Wellington, and trying to remember to whom that dish should be given. More generally (a) would be appropriate where "mine" (the fact of identifying S as the recipient) was given information, and "the beef Wellington" was new information; whereas (b) would be appropriate where the given-new relations were reversed. One may assume that each utterance would be pronounced with the nucleus as indicated here:

(a)Mine is the beef WÈLLINGTON  (b)The beef Wellington is MÌNE

 

2.2 SYNTACTIC STRATEGIES IN ASSIGNING FOCUS

(i)Inversion

The fronting of A and Cs in intensive patterns naturally carries V-S inversion so that there is no nuclear focus on the verb:

(3) Here's the post

(4) Never has it been cheaper to go to the Caribean Islands

 

(ii)fronting

the achievement of marked theme by moving into initial position an item which otherwise is unusual there.

(5) Fool Joe may be, but thief he is not

 

(iii)cleft and pseudo-cleft sentences

Division of a sentence into two with their own verbs:

(6) Serbian troops violated the cease-fire

(6a)It is the Servian troops that violated the cease-fire

(6b)It is the cease-fire that the Servian troops violated

(6c)What the Serbian troops violated is the ceased-fire

a) and b) are cleft sentences while c) is pseudo-cleft.

 

(iv)postponement

The passive, together with other lexical and grammatical devices, are other procedures to change the focus of a sentence:

(7)Without a prescription you cannot buy this drug

(7a)Without a prescription this drug is not sold

 

(v)extraposition

In extraposition we combine postponement with substitution. It operates almost exclusively on subordinate nominal clauses, especially with clausal subject:

(8) It is a nuIsance that banks are closed on Saturdays

(vi)existential "there"

Existential clauses are introduced by there followed by BE + NP (occasionally seem, appear, arise):

(9) There was a dreadful accident yesterday

Syntactically, the NP is the notional subject which has been transferred to the position after the verb, a position usually occupied by a complement. The NP represents new information and for this reason it is usually indefinite. 

Factors in the choice of alternative wordings

THEME                  

-Signal to direct H's expectations

-S=s assumptions about H's knowledge.

-Cohesion.

 

THEMES (continuative, conjunctive, modal, relational, vocative) + REPRESENTATIONAL  

THEMATIC CONNECTION

TEXTS:    - external connections

                - internal connections: CHAIN: known --- unknown

[1] Mary invited me to her BÌRTHDAY party/ It was held in a West End HOTEL/ where I met her PARENTS/ The father is a retired DENTIST.

THEMATIC UNIT --- PROSODIC CLIMAX

Non-linear connection:

[2] Mr Fraser (1) sent for the doctor (2); he (1) listened anxiously for his (2) arrival; he (1) asked him (2) to examine his (1) throat.

Extra-textual connection: 

[3] The police (1) prohibited the strikers (2) from demonstrating because

-they (1) anticipated violence

-they (2) advocated violence

 

RHEMATIC CONNECTION

[4] Caroline arrived on Tuesday and Roger finished his thesis on Friday.

DISCOURSE STRATEGIES

 

STEP: step by step (instructional)

[5]The 100metre race was run immediately after luch. This was followed by the 400metre relay. After a brief interlude with an acrobatic display, spectators...

CHAIN: definite links by direction may be curve, the course double back and the ultimate point unpredictable. 

[6] The narrow bridges, slats missing, are considered by the natives hereabouts to be dangerous, fit only for carefree boys to fish off. They rarely catch any fish, according to Old Cash at the general store. What crackers he has!

 

STACK: Predetermined unit but no linear progression, instead we find like a vertical structure with a sound foundation (topic sentence), an accumulation of layers, finally capped by a roof.

[7] There is something very unsatisfactory about the maxim “Honesty is the best policy”. It seems to equate virtue with profit, yet our common experience denies this. We could all cite instances of where an honest and virtuous action has brought disappointment and even ruin.

 

BALANCE: plus and minus, hot and cold, reflective, exploratory discourse

[8] For a spring break, Cumbria is hard to beat. There is of course a strong risk of bad weather during the early months of the year. On the other hand, the early tourist is rewarded by empty roads and the feeling that he has the countryside to himself. Not all the hotels are open, it is true, and you may be obliged to drive on to the next village. But this is well offset by the welcome that awaits you...

 

 

References:

Downing, A. & P.Locke (1992) A University Course in English Grammar, London: Prentice Hall

Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.  

Quirk, R. et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman


 

3. FROM TEXT TO DISCOURSE

 

RULES & PRINCIPLES: SEMANTICS & PRAGMATICS

Meaning:

What does X mean?    semantics

What did you mean by X?    pragmatics

Pragmatics: study of meaning in relation to speech situations

 

PRINCIPLES (e.g., the cooperative principle)

    -apply variably to different contexts of language use

    -apply in variable degrees

    -can conflict with one another

    -can be contravened without abnegation of the activity they control

 

TASK: Compare this features of pragmatic principles and consider their counterparts in grammatical rules.

 

# 1. GRAMMAR IS RULE GOVERNED - PRAGMATICS IS PRINCIPLE GOVERNED

e.g. passive: rules (sets of changes, how it is formed); principles (end-focus, preference)

 

# 2. RULES OF GRAMMAR ARE CONVENTIONAL - PRINCIPLES OF PRAGMATICS ARE NON-CONVENTIONAL

e.g. I'll pay you back tomorrow (sense & force)

 

# 3 GENERAL PRAGMATICS RELATES SENSE TO FORCE

 

# 4 GRAMMATICAL EXPLANATIONS ARE FORMAL - PRAGMATIC EXPLANATIONS ARE FUNCTIONAL

 

# 5 GRAMMAR IS IDEATIONAL - PRAGMATICS IS INTERPERSONAL AND TEXTUAL  

 

DEFINITIONS OF DISCOURSE

paradigms structural functional

-lang. as grammar

-priority of code

-referential function

-arbitrary elements

-homogeneous code

-lang. as mental phen.

-universals

-acquisition: capacity

-autonomous system

-lang. as speech

-priority of use

-social functions

-appropriate elements

-speech communities

-lang. as social phen.

-uses

-acquisition: deveopment

-social function

assumptions

-independence of functions

-influence of functions

 

FORMALIST DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE

-Language above the sentence

-Structure and units

-Structural analyses: constituents - relationships - arrangements 

PROBLEMS:

    -sentence as unit: written lang./spoken lang.

    -"independent form with structural dependence"

    -discourse ~ structure

 

TASK: Examine the following piece of discourse and consider (i) How do we identify (A) as a question? and (ii) What is the background knowledge?

(A) Are you free for lunch today?

(B) I have to advise students all day.

 

FUNCTIONAL DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE

-Language in use: purpose and function

-System through which particular functions are realized

-Functional analyses: 

    functions served by a system

    how particular units are used

    intended communicative force

    display of social identity

    transmission of information

 

PROBLEMS

    -speech acts are analyzed at sentence level

 

DISCOURSE AS UTTERANCES

Data: collection of inherently contextualized units of language use.

Utterance: context-bound realization of sentences

 

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

DISCOURSE AND COMMUNICATION

 

Aspects of communication:

participants (sender, speaker, receiver, hearer)

message (thoughts, intentions)

medium (code dependent, context dependent)

inter-subjectivity (shared knowledge)

 

(A) CODE MODEL

COMMUNICATION: TRANSMISSION OF THOUGHTS

INTER-SUBJECTIVITY: shared code

SENDER has THOUGHTS which are transformed into SIGNALS and TRANSMITTED to the intended recipient

MESSAGE: thoughts.

 

(B) INFERENTIAL MODEL

COMMUNICATION: DISPLAY INTENTIONS

    -achievement of inter-subjectivity

    -recipient mirrors sender

    -prior knowledge

INTENTIONS: referential information (propositional) + expressive, social information (non-propositional)

SHARED CODE + SHARED PRINCIPLES

 

(C) INTERACTIONAL MODEL

COMMUNICATION: INTENTIONAL + NON-INTENTIONAL BEHAVIOR: DISPLAY INFORMATION

Recipient achievement of an interpretation of displayed information

INFORMATION IS GIVEN AND GIVEN OFF

ROLES: INITIATOR - RECIPIENT

 

e.g.,

A -Hi!

B -Hi!

(A) Greeting signal

(B) Recognized intention to greet

(C) Hi1 response to situation itself: mutual access, informal, prior contact

Hi2 same as Hi1; or response to situation created

 

REFERENCES

Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (USA): Blackwell